tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6830960.post2331103845629718454..comments2023-09-17T15:28:06.769+07:00Comments on . . . not so egg-nymore : 449ranihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12482506500025174557noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6830960.post-63709208673658295682009-11-07T14:46:31.229+07:002009-11-07T14:46:31.229+07:00thanks for the tips, mas harry. hmmm... actually I...thanks for the tips, mas harry. hmmm... actually I wonder how long office 2003 will still be convenient to use, when everybody start moving to 2007. I still prefer 2003, thoughranihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12482506500025174557noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6830960.post-1361346167847097882009-11-04T17:54:12.160+07:002009-11-04T17:54:12.160+07:00Office 2003 should be fine on Ubuntu, heck once I ...Office 2003 should be fine on Ubuntu, heck once I even created an open source POS (point of sale) running on Access 2003 ON Linux / Ubuntu.<br /><br />(the said application ended up shelved because Access is WAY too buggy - even when JUST being used as front-end (the backend is using PostgreSQL))<br /><br />Anyway, Office 2007 would be a totally different beast. But 2003 should be alright.sufehmihttp://harry.sufehmi.comnoreply@blogger.com